Reports

— Organization
Organizational View
Reports/Felix Gray
Felix Gray

Felix Gray

Scored
Product Delivery·Product & Design·Oct 9, 2026

Below the bar this period. Claims are vague, evidence is thin, and little moved forward.

Score
6.0/10
Criteria Analysis

Impact & Outcomes

Score
6.7 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Nothing shipped this week — that is on me and I have re-cut the scope.
Interpretation
Activity is reported, but no completed result or measurable change is attributed to it. The target requires a delivered outcome, not effort alone.
Coaching
Choose the largest completed outcome and report its size, beneficiary, and next consequence.

Execution Quality

Score
5.4 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Nothing shipped this week — that is on me and I have re-cut the scope.
Interpretation
The report identifies rework or an unresolved defect without showing that the underlying cause was closed. Execution remains below the completeness target.
Coaching
Close the root cause and add the check that would catch the same failure before release.

Ownership & Initiative

Score
6.5 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Spec work stalled waiting on input I should have chased sooner.
Interpretation
Progress stopped at the obstacle rather than continuing through resolution. The criterion expects proactive ownership of the outcome.
Coaching
Pick up the unresolved part end to end and report the completed recovery step.

Collaboration

Score
5.3 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Spec work stalled waiting on input I should have chased sooner.
Interpretation
No teammate was shown contributing to or benefiting from the work. The target requires actively unblocking or elevating others.
Coaching
Bring the affected teammate into the work before hand-off and agree who owns the next step.

Communication

Score
7.4 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Ran 2 research sessions instead of the 4 planned.
Interpretation
Readable, but the important point is buried under the routine detail. Target approached: Written updates are specific, concise, and honest.

Growth & Learning

Score
5.5 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Nothing shipped this week — that is on me and I have re-cut the scope.
Interpretation
A next step is mentioned without a hypothesis or decision rule. That approaches reflection but not the required experiment.
Coaching
Write the hypothesis and decision rule before the next attempt.