Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Moved the bulk actions spec to build-ready after 4 rounds of critique.

Interpretation

Outcomes are there but stated loosely; the reader has to infer the size of the impact. Target approached: Delivered results tied to a metric or clear outcome.

Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Ran 4 usability sessions; the main finding was people miss the save action, so we are testing a sticky footer.

Interpretation

Quality bar is met throughout, including the unglamorous parts that usually slip. Target hit: Work is correct, complete, and holds the quality bar.

Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Moved the bulk actions spec to build-ready after 4 rounds of critique.

Interpretation

Saw what needed doing and did it — no waiting for direction. Target hit: Takes problems end-to-end without being asked.

Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Ran 4 usability sessions; the main finding was people miss the save action, so we are testing a sticky footer.

Interpretation

Responsive to others; not yet the person who pulls the group along. Target approached: Actively unblocks and elevates teammates.

Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Moved the bulk actions spec to build-ready after 4 rounds of critique.

Interpretation

Readable, but the important point is buried under the routine detail. Target approached: Written updates are specific, concise, and honest.

Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Ran 4 usability sessions; the main finding was people miss the save action, so we are testing a sticky footer.

Interpretation

A next step is mentioned without a hypothesis or decision rule. That approaches reflection but not the required experiment.

Coaching

Write the hypothesis and decision rule before the next attempt.