Reports

— Organization
Organizational View
Reports/Leo Kim
Leo Kim

Leo Kim

Reviewed
Product Delivery·Product & Design·Oct 9, 2026

Developing. Some real evidence, though a few claims outpace the outcomes described.

Score
7.0/10
Criteria Analysis

Impact & Outcomes

Score
7.1 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Moved the bulk actions spec to build-ready after 3 rounds of critique.
Interpretation
Outcomes are there but stated loosely; the reader has to infer the size of the impact. Target approached: Delivered results tied to a metric or clear outcome.

Execution Quality

Score
6.3 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Ran 5 usability sessions; the main finding was people miss the save action, so we are testing a sticky footer.
Interpretation
The gap surfaced after execution rather than through a planned check. That falls short of the required quality bar.
Coaching
Define the completion check before starting and record whether it passed before hand-off.

Ownership & Initiative

Score
7.8 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Moved the bulk actions spec to build-ready after 3 rounds of critique.
Interpretation
Saw what needed doing and did it — no waiting for direction. Target hit: Takes problems end-to-end without being asked.

Collaboration

Score
5.7 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Ran 5 usability sessions; the main finding was people miss the save action, so we are testing a sticky footer.
Interpretation
The work stayed within the individual lane, with no reusable help or shared learning. That misses the criterion’s team-elevation requirement.
Coaching
Share the method from this work with one teammate and record what it helped them unblock.

Communication

Score
6.1 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Moved the bulk actions spec to build-ready after 3 rounds of critique.
Interpretation
The risk was recorded after it affected the work rather than when action was possible. That falls short of honest, timely communication.
Coaching
Surface the risk when it first appears and state the decision needed in the opening sentence.

Growth & Learning

Score
6.2 / 10
Comparison
Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.
Evidence
Ran 5 usability sessions; the main finding was people miss the save action, so we are testing a sticky footer.
Interpretation
A next step is mentioned without a hypothesis or decision rule. That approaches reflection but not the required experiment.
Coaching
Write the hypothesis and decision rule before the next attempt.