Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Two renewals closed this week worth $125k combined.

Interpretation

Outcomes are named and tied to a figure, so each claim can be checked without a follow-up question. Target hit: Delivered results tied to a metric or clear outcome.

Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Ran the health review across the full book and surfaced 3 risks before they showed up in usage data.

Interpretation

Work is complete and holds up — no loose ends handed to someone else to close. Target hit: Work is correct, complete, and holds the quality bar.

Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Two renewals closed this week worth $125k combined.

Interpretation

Took problems end to end without being asked, including one nobody had assigned. Target hit: Takes problems end-to-end without being asked.

Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Ran the health review across the full book and surfaced 3 risks before they showed up in usage data.

Interpretation

Actively unblocked teammates and shared what worked instead of keeping it local. Target hit: Actively unblocks and elevates teammates.

Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Two renewals closed this week worth $125k combined.

Interpretation

Gets the facts across; the significance of them is left for the reader to work out. Target approached: Written updates are specific, concise, and honest.

Score

Comparison

Not enough prior data for a baseline comparison.

Evidence

Ran the health review across the full book and surfaced 3 risks before they showed up in usage data.

Interpretation

Diagnosed what was not working and changed the approach rather than repeating it. Target hit: Diagnoses what is not working and tests a change.